Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:54 pm
Just my two cents, a year later:
To op: you are not alone. Asking yourself if you want to be a part of the whole "degeneracy" is fine. A lot of people don't ask themselves this because they are not "perceptive" or "critical thinking" enough to even reflect on such issues. They might just not be smart enough. Or they weren't surrounded by the particular environment that would push them to think about such a dilemma. Or a mix of all the prior. So don't feel lonely.
Also, you're right: when compared to the "low lay-count" cohort, women with high lay-counts are less desirable to men around the world coming from different cultures and religions, and from different eras, too. How can it be "cultural reprogramming" (or whatever the term used in the posts was) if it is extremely present INTER-culturally. In any case, it's rather people looking to confirm absurd biases that suffer to a certain extent of such a programming. As somebody pointed out, there are multiple (an infinity) studies out there on the topic and its tangents; the bottomline is that promiscuous girls are a liability to the passing-on of genes of a particular guy.
In terms of practical solutions, one approach is to try to be the best you can be. Then ideally, if you're "high-value" enough, you'll have a pool of girls (that will all look kind of identical to your own eyes) from which to choose one. And that's what you can do, with the added benefit you would be so much more valuable than any of the candidates that, out of self-interest, the one you choose will be loyal beyond believe (if you keep the same "value" ratio when compared to her).
Goals
Become weight restored after anorexia